IPR

VinFast Patents Minio Green EV in India, MG Comet EV Rival Incoming

by

Vietnamese automaker VinFast has filed a design patent in India for its compact Minio Green EV. The micro electric car is set to compete directly with the MG Comet EV, a popular choice in India’s urban EV segment.

Compact Design, Urban Focus

The VinFast Minio Green EV measures 3,090 mm in length, making it slightly bigger than the MG Comet EV. It comes with a 1,625 mm height and a 2,065 mm wheelbase, ensuring good interior space for city use.

Its design highlights include LED semicircular headlights, vertical tail-lamps, flap-type door handles, black ORVMs, and 13-inch steel wheels. A shark-fin antenna completes its urban hatchback look.

Interior with Minimalist Touch

The cabin of the Minio Green EV is simple yet practical. It offers a two-spoke steering wheel, fabric seats, and a digital instrument cluster that also acts as the infotainment screen. The EV comes with a two-speaker audio system and a four-way adjustable driver’s seat, designed to keep costs low.

Battery, Range, and Speed

The VinFast Minio Green EV packs a 14.7 kWh battery paired with a rear-mounted electric motor. The motor delivers 27 hp and 65 Nm torque. On a full charge, it claims a driving range of 170 km (NEDC cycle).

The EV can achieve a top speed of 80 km/h. It also supports charging speeds of up to 12 kW, making it a practical choice for short city commutes.

Safety Features

VinFast has included basic safety features in the Minio Green EV. The car comes with a driver-side airbag, ABS with EBD, and traction control.

India Strategy and Market Impact

VinFast is building a strong base in India with its manufacturing plant in Tamil Nadu. The facility has an annual capacity of 50,000 units, expandable to 150,000 units. Local production could help VinFast price the Minio Green EV competitively.

The company aims to capture India’s growing affordable EV market by offering a rival to the MG Comet EV. With rising fuel prices and increasing demand for sustainable mobility, the VinFast Minio Green could emerge as an attractive option for urban buyers and fleet operators.

Amritsar-Born Scientist Surpasses Thomas Edison’s Patent Record

by

A lesser-known but extraordinary Indian-origin scientist, Dr. Gurtej Singh Sandhu, has etched his name in history by surpassing the U.S. patent record once held by the legendary Thomas Alva Edison. Sandhu, who hails from Amritsar and is an alumnus of Guru Nanak Dev University (GNDU), now ranks among the world’s top inventors with more than 1,300 U.S. patents, outshining Edison’s lifetime tally of 1,093.

Who is Gurtej Singh Sandhu?

Dr. Sandhu completed his B.Sc. in physics from GNDU and later pursued a master’s degree and Ph.D. in physics from University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. His academic brilliance and research mindset led him into the semiconductor industry, where his contributions revolutionized memory chip technologies.

Currently serving as Senior Fellow and Vice President at Micron Technology, a leading U.S.-based semiconductor company, Sandhu has quietly built a reputation as one of the most impactful scientists in the world of electronics.

Surpassing Edison’s Century-Old Record

For over a century, Thomas Edison—the inventor of the electric bulb, phonograph, and motion picture camera—held the image of the world’s most prolific inventor, with 1,093 U.S. patents. However, in the last three decades, Sandhu has outpaced that milestone with groundbreaking innovations.

As of 2025, he holds between 1,325 and 1,432 U.S. utility patents (depending on source), placing him in the top 7 prolific inventors globally. Unlike Edison, whose patents spanned household technologies, Sandhu’s focus has been on semiconductors and nanoscale memory devices, powering the backbone of the digital age.

His Key Innovations

Dr. Sandhu’s work is vital for the evolution of computing, smartphones, cloud storage, and artificial intelligence. Some of his notable contributions include:

Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) techniques for high-volume chip manufacturing.

Development of Oxygen-free Titanium Nitride (TiN) layers, critical for memory devices.

Pitch-doubling lithography methods, which allowed circuits to be shrunk far beyond conventional limits.

Pioneering work in 3D NAND flash memory, the foundation of modern data storage.

These breakthroughs extended Moore’s Law, enabling faster, smaller, and more efficient devices that power billions of digital systems today.

Recognition and Awards

Sandhu’s contributions have earned him global respect. Notably, he received the IEEE Andrew S. Grove Award (2018), one of the highest honors in the semiconductor industry, for his pioneering role in device scaling. His work has also been recognized by academic institutions and scientific bodies worldwide.

Despite his towering achievements, Sandhu has remained relatively low-profile compared to Silicon Valley celebrities, focusing quietly on research and innovation.

A Moment of Pride for India

For India, his journey from Amritsar to global innovation leadership is a source of immense pride. GNDU, his alma mater, has publicly celebrated his achievements, calling him an inspiration for young Indian scientists and innovators.

Sandhu’s story demonstrates how Indian-origin scientists continue to redefine global technology frontiers. By surpassing Edison’s century-old patent record, he has not only set a new benchmark in inventorship but also highlighted India’s contribution to the modern knowledge economy.

India Plans Major Overhaul of Intellectual Property Laws

by

Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal has signalled a sweeping reform of India’s intellectual property (IP) framework. The government aims to simplify laws, speed up processes, and create new avenues for commercial use of registered rights.

Goyal said the government is open to introducing new laws and making amendments where needed. He added that officials will study how trademarks can be better leveraged for revenue and economic growth.

The minister highlighted that India’s IP ecosystem has made significant progress in recent years. Patent grants have risen sharply. Trademark filings have also surged, making India the sixth-largest filer worldwide. Yet, Goyal acknowledged that trademark registration timelines remain long and need to be reduced.

The reforms come after the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 took effect on August 1, 2024. The law decriminalised several minor IP offences and replaced prison terms with monetary penalties. It also introduced a 10% automatic increase in fines every three years.

To boost efficiency, the government recently launched AI- and machine-learning-based tools for trademark searches. The new IP Saarthi chatbot offers guidance in local languages, making the process more accessible to entrepreneurs and small businesses.

Goyal stressed that technology will play a central role in modernising IP administration. Faster examinations, digital tools, and better enforcement mechanisms will help India attract innovation and investment.

He also pointed to the potential of monetising trademarks. While he did not give details, experts say this could involve licensing, brand valuation, and broader commercial use of registered marks.

The push to ease compliance is part of the government’s broader plan to cut outdated rules. According to Goyal, many provisions are redundant and create unnecessary burdens for businesses.

India’s reforms aim to balance protection of rights with ease of doing business. If successful, they could position the country as a global leader in IP administration and innovation-driven growth.

German Firm ParTec Sues Nvidia, Seeks AI Hardware Ban Across 18 European Countries

by

German supercomputing specialist ParTec AG has launched a fresh legal offensive against U.S. chip giant Nvidia, filing a patent infringement lawsuit at the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in Munich. The company aims to secure an injunction that would block the sale of Nvidia’s DGX AI supercomputers in 18 European countries.

ParTec alleges that Nvidia copied its patented dynamic Modular System Architecture (dMSA), a design that enables real-time coordination between CPUs and GPUs for high-efficiency AI computing. According to the filing, the technology is central to modern supercomputing performance and powers some of Europe’s largest AI installations.

The lawsuit marks the third patent dispute ParTec has initiated against Nvidia. The company has also demanded that Nvidia disclose detailed sales figures for the DGX line and pay damages for the alleged infringement.

Collaboration Talks Turned Sour
ParTec claims the dispute began in 2019, when it shared details of its dMSA technology and ParaStation software with Nvidia during discussions about a potential partnership. Despite initial interest, the two firms never formalized an agreement. ParTec says Nvidia later integrated the patented design into its DGX systems without permission.

Nvidia continued to supply GPUs to supercomputing projects linked to ParTec, but the German company argues that the absence of a licensing deal made such use unlawful. ParTec also suggests Nvidia’s reluctance to negotiate may stem from its earlier patent case in Texas against Microsoft, one of Nvidia’s largest customers, over the same technology.

Legal and Market Stakes
If the UPC grants the injunction, Nvidia could be forced to redesign its AI hardware or strike a licensing deal with ParTec before re-entering these 18 European markets. The outcome could disrupt Nvidia’s dominance in AI infrastructure across the region and set a precedent for enforcing European technology patents against major U.S. firms.

ParTec’s legal representative, BF exaQC AG, emphasised that protecting Europe’s home-grown innovations is essential for the continent’s technological sovereignty. “Our inventions power some of the most advanced supercomputers in Europe. We have a duty to defend them,” a company spokesperson said.

The Unified Patent Court’s ruling will carry weight well beyond this dispute. As one of the first high-profile AI hardware cases before the UPC, it could shape how Europe balances innovation protection with global competition in the race for AI supremacy.

Delhi High Court Allows Use of Section 104A at Interim Stage in Patent Cases

by

In a significant development, the Delhi High Court has ruled that Section 104A of the Patents Act, 1970, can be invoked at the interim stage of a patent infringement suit. This allows the plaintiff to seek disclosure of the defendant’s manufacturing process before the trial begins. Justice Amit Bansal delivered the verdict while hearing a case between Roche and Zydus Lifesciences.

Background of the Case

Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche filed a patent infringement suit against Zydus, alleging that the latter had used a patented process to manufacture a biosimilar of Pertuzumab, a drug used to treat breast cancer. Roche claimed that Zydus’s product was identical to the product made using its patented process.

At the interim stage, Roche invoked Section 104A, seeking disclosure of Zydus’s process. Zydus opposed this request, arguing that Section 104A could not be used before the trial. It also claimed its product was different and that such disclosures would harm its trade secrets.

Court’s Observations

Justice Bansal held that the law does not prohibit the use of Section 104A at the interlocutory stage. The Court emphasized that if the plaintiff shows that the defendant’s product is identical to the patented product, then the burden can shift to the defendant. The defendant would then have to prove that they used a different process.

“There is no bar under the Patents Act to invoke Section 104A at the interim stage,” said Justice Bansal.

He further clarified that the section was designed to address the difficulty patent holders face in proving process infringement, especially in complex pharmaceutical cases.

Protection for Trade Secrets

The Court acknowledged Zydus’s concern regarding confidential business information. It stated that while disclosure may be necessary, the court must ensure that commercial secrets are protected. The ruling allows for controlled disclosure, possibly through confidentiality clubs or similar safeguards.

Understanding Section 104A

Section 104A of the Patents Act provides for a burden-shifting mechanism. It comes into play when:

The patent is for a new product made using a patented process.

The plaintiff reasonably believes that the defendant is using the same process.

The plaintiff cannot determine the process used by the defendant through reasonable means.

If these conditions are met, the defendant must then prove that their process is different.

Impact of the Judgment

This ruling is expected to have a major impact on process patent litigation in India, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. It strengthens the ability of patent holders to enforce their rights early in the litigation process.

The Court’s decision ensures that genuine claims by patentees are not delayed unnecessarily. At the same time, it balances commercial interests by protecting trade secrets.

Conclusion

The Delhi High Court’s judgment sets a crucial precedent in Indian patent law. It confirms that Section 104A can be used at the interim stage, provided the plaintiff meets the necessary thresholds. This will likely aid companies facing infringement of process patents, especially in cases involving biosimilars and generic drugs.