Intel Patents “Software-Defined Super Cores” to Boost Single-Thread Performance

by

Intel has filed a new patent that reveals a bold approach to CPU performance. The company proposes “Software-Defined Super Cores”, a technology that lets multiple smaller cores fuse into one powerful virtual core.

How It Works

The system divides a single-threaded task into multiple segments. Each segment runs on a separate core. The instructions then retire in the correct order, so the operating system reads them as if they came from a single core. This process can deliver higher instructions per clock (IPC) without raising voltage or frequency.

According to the published patent, the design uses advanced techniques like shadow store buffers, shared registers, and precise memory ordering. These mechanisms ensure that fused cores maintain accurate execution and avoid errors during parallel processing.

Why It Matters

Modern CPUs already combine performance cores (P-cores) and efficient cores (E-cores) to balance power and speed. But scaling up single cores further is costly and less energy-efficient. Intel’s new method offers a way to boost performance dynamically, without redesigning physical cores.

This flexibility could help Intel deliver faster chips for tasks that rely heavily on single-thread performance, such as gaming, creative workloads, and certain AI applications.

Patent Details

  • Filing date: December 30, 2023
  • Publication date: July 3, 2025
  • Inventors: Jayesh Gaur, Sumeet Bandishte, and team
  • Patent number: US20250165255A1

What’s Next

The concept remains experimental. It is unclear when Intel will bring “Super Cores” into commercial products. However, the filing signals the company’s continued push to innovate in CPU design and challenge rivals like AMD in the race for performance leadership.

For more on Intel’s latest technologies, you can read coverage from TweakTown and VideoCardz.

Graphic Era Researchers Earn Radar-Cloaking Patent for Aircraft Coating

by

Researchers at Graphic Era Deemed University have secured a patent from the Government of India for a breakthrough in stealth technology. The achievement comes from the university’s Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering.

Scientists Wariz Panwar and Vikas Rathi developed a thin Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) shielding film. The film absorbs radar signals in the 12–18 GHz (Ku-band) range. Once applied to aircraft, it prevents radar waves from reflecting back, making them nearly invisible to radar detection.

The invention emerged from the university’s Sensors and Actuators Laboratory. After extensive experiments, the team confirmed that the film absorbs radar waves instead of bouncing them back.

The coating can be applied like ordinary paint, which makes it practical for use. Potential applications include defence aircraft, guided missiles, electronic warfare, satellite communications (DTH, VSAT, mobile links), avionics systems such as in-flight internet, and next-generation electronics like 5G networks and microwave imaging.

Dr (Prof) Kamal Ghanshala, Chairman of Graphic Era Group of Institutions, described the discovery as a “remarkable gift” to the nation. He praised the researchers for contributing to India’s technological strength and highlighted the university’s legacy of patents across healthcare, renewable energy, and artificial intelligence.

The newly granted patent, valid for 20 years, strengthens India’s capabilities in advanced stealth technology and showcases Uttarakhand as a hub for high-impact innovation.

Yamaha Prepares Road-Legal R1 Revival with Active Aero Patent

by

Yamaha is preparing to bring the legendary R1 back to public roads. A recent patent leak reveals a new active aerodynamic system that could help the superbike meet strict emission rules while boosting performance.
Read more

The documents show movable shutters in the fairing’s cooling outlets. These shutters use stepper motors and belts for actuation. An ECU decides their position based on coolant temperature, catalyst temperature, ambient air, throttle input, and speed. This keeps the system lightweight and cost-efficient.
Full details

At higher speeds, the shutters close. This reduces drag and allows the bike to hold top speed with less power. The smoother airflow also adds to stability.
More info

The design also improves emissions. The shutters help the catalytic converter heat up faster, which ensures compliance with Euro 5+ standards.
Learn more

Two versions appear in the diagrams: one with a single large outlet on each side, and another with twin smaller outlets. This provides flexibility in balancing cooling and aerodynamics.
Patent breakdown

The ECU can open or close the vents depending on riding conditions. During slow riding or high ambient heat, vents stay open to cool the engine. At high speed, they close to improve aerodynamics. Under hard acceleration, they may briefly stay shut to maximize airflow efficiency before reopening for cooling.
Analysis

Yamaha had stopped selling the road-legal R1 in Europe due to Euro 5+ restrictions. Only track-spec versions have been available since.
Background

Reintroducing a compliant road model could also give Yamaha a boost in racing. World Superbike rules allow active aero only if the feature appears on the road-going homologated bike.
WSBK context

Industry reports suggest Yamaha may unveil the road-legal R1 with this system at EICMA 2025 in Milan.
Event coverage

Why It Matters

  • The system balances speed, efficiency, and emissions.
  • It showcases a shift toward intelligent aerodynamics in motorcycles.
  • It could mark the R1’s strong return to both road and track.

Sonos Wins Court Ruling to Revive U.S. Patent Case Against Google

by

The legal battle between Sonos and Google has taken a new turn. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on August 28, 2025, that one of Sonos’ patents is valid. This decision revives the company’s long-running lawsuit against Google. Source: Reuters

Appeals Court Reverses Earlier Decision

The Federal Circuit overturned a 2023 ruling by U.S. District Judge William Alsup. The judge had previously invalidated the patent due to Sonos’ 13-year delay in filing. He ruled that the delay made the patent unenforceable. The appeals court disagreed. It found that Google did not suffer harm because of the delay.

A Case That Started in 2020

Sonos first sued Google in 2020. The company alleged that Google copied its wireless audio technology in products such as Google Home speakers and Chromecast Audio. In May 2023, a jury awarded Sonos $32.5 million in damages. That verdict was later overturned when Judge Alsup ruled the patents invalid.

Sonos Welcomes the Decision

A Sonos spokesperson praised the latest ruling. The company expressed hope that Google will now enter fair licensing negotiations. Sonos has argued that Google’s products rely heavily on its patented audio technology.

Google’s Position

Google has denied the allegations. The company has also redesigned its devices in recent years to avoid infringement. In April 2024, the Federal Circuit allowed the import of those redesigned products, stating they did not violate Sonos’ patents. Read more here.

What the Ruling Means

The latest decision gives Sonos another chance to fight for compensation and enforce its patents. The case will now return to the San Francisco federal court for further proceedings. Legal experts believe the ruling could strengthen Sonos’ hand in future licensing talks and shape the wider smart speaker market.

Bill Belichick, Jordon Hudson File “Gold Digger” Trademark

by

Former NFL coach Bill Belichick and his partner Jordon Hudson have filed for a trademark on the phrase “Gold Digger”, aiming to launch a jewelry and keychain line. The move, made through Hudson’s company Trouble Cub Enterprises, has raised eyebrows for its cheeky play on public perception.

A Pattern of Bold Trademarks

This is not Hudson’s first attempt at creative branding. Earlier, she applied for phrases tied to Belichick’s coaching career, adding the suffix “(Bill’s Version)” to slogans such as “Do Your Job” and “No Days Off”. The approach mirrors singer Taylor Swift’s re-recording strategy, but trademark experts note that many of these filings may face opposition from the New England Patriots, who already own rights to those phrases.

The “Gold Digger” filing, however, takes a different route. It leans less on sports legacy and more on irony, aiming to turn a controversial label into a profitable business identity.

Similar Trademark Gambits in India

India has witnessed several unconventional and controversial trademark filings, where personal branding, cultural sensitivity, and commercial ambition collided:

  • Reliance’s “Operation Sindoor”: Reliance Jio Studios filed a trademark referencing India’s military strikes. The move was met with backlash for commercializing a sensitive event, forcing the company to withdraw the application.
  • Dhoni’s “Captain Cool”: Former cricket captain MS Dhoni reportedly filed for his nickname as a trademark, sparking buzz and jokes about potential merchandise.
  • Odisha’s Jagannath Temple Terms: The Odisha government sought to trademark phrases linked to the Jagannath Temple in Puri, to prevent misuse of religious and cultural heritage.
  • “Chutiyaram” Rejection: A provocative slang-based application was revoked by the Trademark Office for obscenity.

The Bigger Picture

These cases, in the U.S. and India alike, reveal how trademarks are no longer just about products. They have become tools of personal identity, pop culture, and public relations. From Dhoni protecting his cricketing aura to Hudson reclaiming a controversial label, each filing pushes the boundaries of what can be owned and monetized.

Trademark experts caution that while such applications grab attention, they often face legal hurdles and public backlash. Yet, they highlight a clear trend: branding today is as much about narrative as it is about law.

Bombay High Court Restores Ban on Cognizant’s Logo Use in India

by

The Bombay High Court has reinstated an injunction that bars Cognizant Technology Solutions from using its logo in India. The decision, issued on 26 August 2025, marks a setback for the U.S.-based IT services giant as it battles an ongoing trademark dispute with Atyati Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Division Bench Overturns Earlier Relief

A division bench led by Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep V. Marne revived a March 2024 interim injunction that had originally restrained Cognizant from displaying or using the contested logo. The bench set aside a June 2024 single-judge order which had temporarily allowed Cognizant to continue using its brand mark while the case was pending.

With the latest ruling, Cognizant must immediately stop using its logo across operations in India until the trademark infringement lawsuit reaches final resolution.

Background of the Dispute

The dispute began when Atyati Technologies, a Bengaluru-based technology solutions provider, alleged that Cognizant’s logo closely resembled its registered device mark. Atyati argued that the similarity could mislead customers and erode its brand identity.

On 19 March 2024, a single-judge bench of the Bombay High Court granted an ex-parte injunction in Atyati’s favour, stopping Cognizant from using the disputed design. However, in June 2024, the same bench withdrew the order after finding that Atyati had not disclosed certain material facts. As a result, Cognizant was allowed to resume using its logo.

The 13 June 2024 order further granted Cognizant interim relief, permitting continued use of the logo during litigation. This relief has now been nullified by the division bench.

Cognizant’s Response

In a statement following the ruling, Cognizant said it would review the court’s order and explore all available legal remedies. The company emphasized its commitment to protecting its brand reputation while ensuring compliance with Indian laws.

What Lies Ahead

The case highlights the increasing importance of trademark protection in India’s IT sector, where global corporations and domestic companies frequently clash over brand identity and intellectual property. The ban could force Cognizant to temporarily rebrand its operations in India, one of its largest markets outside the United States.

The matter will now proceed to a full hearing, where the court will decide whether Cognizant’s logo indeed infringes on Atyati’s registered mark. Until then, the restored injunction will remain in effect.

Indian-Pioneered Smart Mirror Aims to Revolutionize Global Healthcare

by

An Indian inventor has patented a Smart Mirror system that could reshape healthcare globally. The innovation turns ordinary mirrors into AI-driven health monitors.

The system embeds AI-based image analytics. Once fully developed, it could spot early signs of strokes, heart ailments, and respiratory issues.

It uses federated learning to keep health data private while learning from multiple sources.

Key benefits include:

  • Boosting independent living among the elderly.
  • Reducing caregiver demands and hospital readmissions.
  • Extending healthcare to underserved communities.
  • Providing real-time, 24/7 monitoring.

“Invention goes beyond concept. It offers a blueprint to tackle global healthcare issues—from aging populations to doctor shortages,” said Kunwar Siddharth Tiwary, the inventor. He holds dual Master’s degrees in Information Systems and Industrial Engineering. He is pursuing a PhD in Information Technology and has over a decade of healthcare analytics experience.

What Could Follow

The Smart Mirror could aid in chronic disease management, such as diabetes and heart disease, when paired with proper sensors and AI.

It can also support elderly care, with features like fall detection, medication reminders, and emergency alerts.

The system could act as an early warning tool in health crises like pandemics, while keeping individual privacy intact.

And in rural areas, it could bring diagnostic support where medical infrastructure is limited.

Explore More

Delhi High Court Rules Common Words Cannot Be Monopolised in Yatra Trademark Dispute

by

The Delhi High Court has ruled that businesses cannot monopolise everyday words as trademarks. The decision came in a trademark dispute between Yatra Online Limited and Mach Conferences and Events Limited, the company behind the brand BookMyYatra.

Justice Tejas Karia dismissed Yatra’s plea to stop BookMyYatra from using the term. The court observed that “Yatra”, a Hindi word meaning travel, is generic and descriptive in the travel industry. Therefore, it cannot be granted exclusive protection as a trademark.

Court’s Reasoning

The court pointed out that Yatra Online had registered trademarks such as “Yatra with device” and “Yatra Freight.” However, these registrations carried explicit disclaimers stating that no exclusive rights were claimed over the standalone word “Yatra.”

Because of these disclaimers, the court ruled that Yatra Online could not expand its rights to claim monopoly over the word. The judgment reaffirmed that generic or descriptive words do not indicate the origin of goods or services, and thus lack distinctiveness.

Wider Legal Context

This ruling is consistent with earlier judgments. In 2023, the Delhi High Court held that words of common English usage cannot be registered as trademarks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The law prevents the registration of marks that are descriptive or devoid of distinctive character.

Legal experts note that only terms that gain secondary meaning through long and exclusive use can qualify for trademark protection. Descriptive and generic words, on the other hand, remain free for all businesses to use.

Industry Impact

The ruling is a significant reminder for businesses in travel and other industries. Companies are encouraged to adopt distinctive brand names instead of relying on common words. Using descriptive terms may create recognition, but they cannot guarantee exclusivity.

DAVV Secures Patent for AI-Powered Face Recognition Attendance System

by

Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya (DAVV) has achieved a major milestone in educational technology. The university has secured a patent for an AI-powered face recognition attendance system. The innovation promises to make attendance management faster, more reliable, and more eco-friendly.

The patent, titled “A System and Method for Taking Attendance in Educational or Professional Settings”, has been granted under the Indian Patents Act, 1970. Read more on the Patents Act here.

Developed by Faculty and Students

The project was developed over two years by Dr. Vaibhav Neema, professor at the Institute of Engineering and Technology (IET), DAVV. He worked with a team of young graduates including Sumiran Jaiswal, Shubh Laad, Pranshu Jain, Utkarsh Gupte, Antriksh Tyagi, Divyanshu Parwal, and Anjali Phadke.

“This innovation will save time and reduce manual effort. It is a scalable and eco-friendly solution,” Dr. Neema said.

How the System Works

The system functions on a web-based interface. Teachers or administrators can upload classroom images. The platform uses machine learning algorithms to detect and identify faces. It then cross-verifies them with a stored database and generates an Excel attendance sheet in real time.

Unlike biometric systems, it does not require physical contact or specialized hardware. A single photograph is enough to register attendance. Once a face is recorded, the system can recognize it for up to 10 years without frequent updates.

Wide Range of Applications

Although designed for educational settings, the AI system has broader applications. Hospitals could use it to verify patient presence. Corporates could implement it for employee attendance. Public transport authorities might also adopt it to detect ticketless travelers.

The developers highlight that the technology is cost-effective and easy to use. Institutions can deploy it without investing in expensive infrastructure.

Why It Matters

The innovation reflects DAVV’s growing role in promoting AI-driven solutions in India’s education sector. With rising student numbers, such technology can cut down administrative load and improve efficiency.

India has seen a surge in AI-powered applications across industries, from healthcare to banking. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has also been pushing for wider adoption of AI tools in governance and services.

Ultrahuman Sues Oura in Delhi High Court Over Smart Ring Patents

by

Indian health-tech startup Ultrahuman has filed a lawsuit against Finnish wearable maker Oura in the Delhi High Court, escalating the global dispute over smart ring patents. The move comes months after Oura pursued legal action against Ultrahuman in the United States.

Counterattack After US Setback

Oura first sued Ultrahuman in Texas in late 2023, alleging patent infringement and unfair competition. The Finnish company claimed that Ultrahuman copied the design and internal architecture of its Oura Ring, including sensors, battery placement, and overall housing structure.

In April 2025, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) delivered an initial ruling in Oura’s favor, finding that Ultrahuman and Chinese rival RingConn had violated several Oura patents. This raised the possibility of an import ban on Ultrahuman’s smart rings in the US market (Economic Times, Wareable).

Ultrahuman, however, rejected the ruling and pointed out that the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) had already questioned the validity of at least one Oura patent.

Delhi High Court Battle

On August 22, 2025, Ultrahuman struck back by filing its own patent infringement case against Oura in Delhi. The company argued that Oura is misusing patents—particularly those acquired from Motiv, a US wearable company—to suppress competition in India.

Ultrahuman accused Oura of attempting to “weaponize” intellectual property rights in order to restrict fair competition in the fast-growing smart ring market.

Growing Market, Rising Conflicts

Smart rings are emerging as a major segment in wearable technology, offering health tracking, sleep monitoring, and fitness insights in compact form factors. With the market expected to expand rapidly, companies are fiercely defending their intellectual property portfolios.

Oura, which popularized the category with its Oura Ring, has been aggressively protecting its patents against rivals. Ultrahuman, on the other hand, has positioned itself as an Indian challenger brand with a growing global presence.

What Lies Ahead

The Delhi High Court case adds a new front to the ongoing global battle. If the court sides with Ultrahuman, it could limit Oura’s ability to enforce its patents in India—one of the fastest-growing markets for wearables.

Meanwhile, the ITC’s final ruling in the US, expected later this year, could determine whether Ultrahuman faces restrictions in exporting its smart rings to America.

The legal fight highlights how intellectual property disputes are shaping the future of wearable tech and could determine which brands dominate the global smart ring industry.